Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Taj Mahal, a hidden truth...........

Taj ......
A hidden truth ..........
Never say that .........It's a Tomb ..........


Aerial view of the Taj Mahal ......

Internal water well  ............




The scene in front of the Taj Mahal and dome


A view of the dome and the peak .....


Fine view of the Peak....(Don't you think that it is a Trishul having a Kalash with  a coconut ) 


Screenshots of the shadow of peak in the yard ......


At the entrance there is a red lotus ........


In the back of the Taj group of 22 rooms ........


Windows and doors closed behind the scene .......


Built especially in Vedic style corridors .....


A contradiction to the Tomb Sangeetaly ........


 Closed rooms located on the upper floor .........


Group of marble rooms located on the lower floor  .........


Flowers made on the wall........ hiding the "Om" 


Stairs to the lower floor .......


Corridor between rooms 300 feet long ..


one of the 22 rooms at lower floor  ...

interior view of  a room out of the 22 secret rooms .......



Another interior view of the closed rooms ..


In a closed room Vedic style Built roof ......


huge skylight(Roshandan) were closed with bricks ..... 


Hidden wall in door that was connecting other rooms.....


To hide a lot of evidence, secret door was closed with bricks ...... 


Palace at Burhanpur in Madhya Pradesh where Mumtaz - ul - Zmaani died....


According to Badshah Nama  place where Mumtaz was actually buried .........


Now please read the following...

Except famous historian Shri P.N. Oak no one has ever challenged the statement that

                            "Taj Mahal was built by Shah Jahan "

P.N Oak says in his book "TAJ MAHAL - THE TRUE STORY" .........
"The whole world is in illusion that the beautiful building the Taj Mahal was built by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan" ...

Oak says that ......
"Taj Mahal was not Begum Mumtaz Mahal's tomb from the beginning rather than it is an ancient Hindu Shiva Temple which was known as Tejo Mahaaly."

His work was published in 1965 in the book, Taj Mahal - The True Story. However, we have not heard much about it because it was banned by the corrupt and power crazed Congress government of Bharat who did not want to alienate their precious vote bank--the muslims.

Beside his book...
There are more than 110 evidence that prove that TajMahal is not tomb instead it is a Temple...  "Tejo Mahaaly" 

I am going to show some of these ....... 
.
NAME 
  • The ending "Mahal"is never muslim because in none of the muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as "Mahal".
  • The unusual explanation of the term Tajmahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal, who is buried in it, is illogical in at least two respects viz., firstly her name was never Mumtaj Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani and secondly one cannot omit the first three letters "Mum" from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name of the building.
  • .Several European visitors of Shahjahan's time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal is almost the correct tradition, age old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple. Contrarily Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using the Sanskrit term and call it just a holy grave.
  • The tomb should be understood to signify NOT A BUILDING but only the grave or centotaph inside it. This would help people to realize that all dead muslim courtiers and royalty including Humayun, Akbar, Mumtaz, Etmad-ud-Daula and Safdarjang have been buried in capture Hindu mansions and temples.
TEMPLE TRADITION
  • .The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the sanskrit term TejoMahalay signifying a Shiva Temple. Agreshwar Mahadev i.e., The Lord of Agra was consecrated in it
  • Visitors may notice that the base slab of the centotaph is the marble basement in plain white while its superstructure and the other three centotaphs on the two floors are covered with inlaid creeper designs. This indicates that the marble pedestal of the Shiva idol is still in place and Mumtaz's centotaphs are fake
  • There are persons who are connected with the repair and the maintainance of the Taj who have seen the ancient sacred Shiva Linga and other idols sealed in the thick walls and in chambers in the secret, sealed red stone stories below the marble basement. The Archaeological Survey of India is keeping discretely, politely and diplomatically silent about it to the point of dereliction of its own duty to probe into hidden historical evidence.
  • .The famous Hindu treatise on architecture titled Vishwakarma Vastushastra mentions the 'Tej-Linga' amongst the Shivalingas i.e., the stone emblems of Lord Shiva, the Hindu deity. Such a Tej Linga was consecrated in the Taj Mahal, hence the term Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya.
  • The people who dominate the Agra region are Jats. Their name of Shiva is Tejaji. The Jat special issue of The Illustrated Weekly of India (June 28,1971) mentions that the Jats have the Teja Mandirs i.e., Teja Temples. This is because Teja-Linga is among the several names of the Shiva Lingas. From this it is apparent that the Taj-Mahal is Tejo-Mahalaya, The Great Abode of Tej.
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
  • The plaque put the archealogy department outside the Tajmahal describes the edifice as a mausoleum built by Shahjahan for his wife Mumtaz Mahal , over 22 years from 1631 to 1653. That plaque is a specimen of historical bungling. Firstly, the plaque sites no authority for its claim. Secondly the lady's name was Mumtaz-ulZamani and not Mumtazmahal. Thirdly, the period of 22 years is taken from some mumbo jumbo noting by an unreliable French visitor Tavernier, to the exclusion of all muslim versions, which is an absurdity.
  •  Prince Aurangzeb's letter to his father,emperor Shahjahan,is recorded in atleast three chronicles titled `Aadaab-e-Alamgiri', `Yadgarnama', and the `Muruqqa-i-Akbarabadi' (edited by Said Ahmed, Agra, 1931, page 43, footnote 2). In that letter Aurangzeb records in 1652 A.D itself that the several buildings in the fancied burial place of Mumtaz were seven storeyed and were so old that they were all leaking, while the dome had developed a crack on the northern side.Aurangzeb, therefore, ordered immediate repairs to the buildings at his own expense while recommending to the emperor that more elaborate repairs be carried out later. This is the proof that during Shahjahan's reign itself that the Taj complex was so old as to need immediate repairs.
  • The three firmans demanding marble were sent to Jaisingh within about two years of Mumtaz's death. Had Shahjahan really built the Tajmahal over a period of 22 years, the marble would have needed only after 15 or 20 years not immediately after Mumtaz's death.
  • Moreover, the three mention neither the Tajmahal, nor Mumtaz, nor the burial. The cost and the quantity of the stone also are not mentioned. This proves that an insignificant quantity of marble was needed just for some supercial tinkering and tampering with the Tajmahal. Even otherwise Shahjahan could never hope to build a fabulous Tajmahal by abject dependence for marble on a non cooperative Jaisingh.
EUROPEAN VISITOR'S ACCOUNTS
  • Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra recorded in 1632 (within only a year of Mumtaz's death) that `the places of note in and around Agra, included Taj-e-Mahal's tomb, gardens and bazaars'.He, therefore, confirms that that the Tajmahal had been a noteworthy building even before Shahjahan.
  • ohan Albert Mandelslo, who describes life in agra in 1638 (only 7 years after mumtaz's death) in detail (in his `Voyages and Travels to West-Indies', published by John Starkey and John Basset, London), makes no mention of the Tajmahal being under constuction though it is commonly erringly asserted or assumed that the Taj was being built from 1631 to 1653.
  • A clue to the tampering by Shahjahan is found on pages 216-217, vol. 4, of Archealogiical Survey of India Reports (published 1874) stating that a "great square black balistic pillar which, with the base and capital of another pillar....now in the grounds of Agra,...it is well known, once stood in the garden of Tajmahal".
MISSING ELEPHANTS


  •  Far from the building of the Taj, Shahjahan disfigured it with black koranic lettering and heavily robbed it of its Sanskrit inscription, several idols and two huge stone elephants extending their trunks in a welcome arch over the gateway where visitors these days buy entry tickets. An Englishman, Thomas Twinning, records (pg.191 of his book "Travels in India A Hundred Years ago") that in November 1794 "I arrived at the high walls which enclose the Taj-e-Mahal and its circumjacent buildings. I here got out of the palanquine and.....mounted a short flight of steps leading to a beautiful portal which formed the centre of this side of the `COURT OF ELEPHANTS" as the great area was called."



CARBON 14 TEST
  •  A wooden piece from the riverside doorway of the Taj subjected to the carbon 14 test by an American Laboratory, has revealed that the door to be 300 years older than Shahjahan,since the doors of the Taj, broken open by Muslim invaders repeatedly from the 11th century onwards, had to b replaced from time to time. The Taj edifice is much more older. It belongs to 1155 A.D, i.e., almost 500 years anterior to Shahjahan.
BASELESS LOVE STORIES
  • Stories of Shahjahan's exclusive infatuation for Mumtaz's are concoctions. They have no basis in history nor has any book ever written on their fancied love affairs. Those stories have been invented as an afterthought to make Shahjahan's authorship of the Taj look plausible.
PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION
  • Likewise the period of construction has been guessed to be anywhere between 10 years and 22 years. There would have not been any scope for guesswork had the building construction been on record in the court papers.
THE HINDU DOME
  •  The Tajmahal has a reverberating dome. Such a dome is an absurdity for a tomb which must ensure peace and silence. Contrarily reverberating domes are a neccesity in Hindu temples because they create an ecstatic dinmultiplying and magnifying the sound of bells, drums and pipes accompanying the worship of Hindu deities.
  • The Tajmahal dome bears a lotus cap. Original Islamic domes have a bald top as is exemplified by the Pakistan Embassy in Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, and the domes in the Pakistan's newly built capital Islamabad.
  • The Tajmahal entrance faces south. Had the Taj been an Islamic building it should have faced the west.
PRE-SHAHJAHAN REFERENCES TO THE TAJ
  • Apparently the Taj as a central palace seems to have an chequered history. The Taj was perhaps desecrated and looted by every Muslim invader from Mohammad Ghazni onwards but passing into Hindu hands off and on, the sanctity of the Taj as a Shiva temple continued to be revived after every muslim onslaught. Shahjahan was the last muslim to desecrate the Tajmahal alias Tejomahalay.
  •  Vincent Smith records in his book titled `Akbar the Great Moghul' that `Babur's turbulent life came to an end in his garden palace in Agra in 1630'. That palace was none other than the Tajmahal.
  •  Babur's daughter Gulbadan Begum in her chronicle titled `Humayun Nama' refers to the Taj as the Mystic House.
  • Babur himself refers to the Taj in his memoirs as the palace captured by Ibrahim Lodi containing a central octagonal chamber and having pillars on the four sides. All these historical references allude to the Taj 100 years before Shahjahan
ARCHITECHTURAL EVIDENCE

  • Between the so-called mosque and the drum house is a multistoried octagonal well with a flight of stairs reaching down to the water level. This is a traditional treasury well in Hindu temple palaces. Treasure chests used to be kept in the lower apartments while treasury personnel had their offices in the upper chambers. The circular stairs made it difficult for intruders to reach down to the treasury or to escape with it undetected or unpursued. In case the premises had to be surrendered to a besieging enemy the treasure could be pushed into the well to remain hidden from the conquerer and remain safe for salvaging if the place was reconquered. Such an elaborate multistoried well is superflous for a mere mausoleum. Such a grand, gigantic well is unneccesary for a tomb.
  • The marble that Shahjahan used for grafting Koranic lettering in the Taj is of a pale white shade while the rest of the Taj is built of a marble with rich yellow tint. This disparity is proof of the Koranic extracts being a superimposition.
  • he Tajmahal has a trident pinncle over the dome. A full scale of the trident pinnacle is inlaid in the red stone courtyard to the east of the Taj. The central shaft of the trident depicts a "Kalash" (sacred pot) holding two bent mango leaves and a coconut. This is a sacred Hindu motif. Identical pinnacles have been seen over Hindu and Buddhist temples in the Himalayan region. Tridents are also depicted against a red lotus background at the apex of the stately marble arched entrances on all four sides of the Taj.
  • People fondly but mistakenly believed all these centuries that the Taj pinnacle depicts a Islamic cresent and star was a lighting conductor installed by the British rulers in India. Contrarily, the pinnacle is a marvel of Hindu metallurgy since the pinnacle made of non rusting alloy, is also perhaps a lightning deflector. That the pinnacle of the replica is drawn in the eastern courtyard is significant because the east is of special importance to the Hindus, as the direction in which the sun rises. The pinnacle on the dome has the word `Allah' on it after capture. The pinnacle figure on the ground does not have the word Allah.
  • Above Mumtaz's centotaph hangs a chain by which now hangs a lamp. Before capture by Shahjahan the chain used to hold a water pitcher from which water used to drip on the Shivalinga.
  •  It is this earlier Hindu tradition in the Tajmahal which gave the Islamic myth of Shahjahan's love tear dropping on Mumtaz's tomb on the full moon day of the winter eve.

--->There is only one way either prove or disprove the research of Oak and that is to open the closed doors of Taj Mahal or Tejo Mahaalya<--- .
But our government will never try to do that because of big numbers of muslim votes 
--




आंसू टपक रहे हैं,हवेली के बाम से
रूहें लिपट के रोती हैं हर खासों आम से.....
अपनों ने बुना था हमें,कुदरत के काम से...
फ़िर भी यहाँ जिंदा हैं हम गैरों के नाम से......







12 comments:

  1. strange ...............

    ReplyDelete
  2. I greatly appreciate the person working on this for his interest and sincerity. The topic seems to be so inspiring and unveiling a lot of hidden facts, if proven true would bring in popularity and a lot of attention specially to the young. This study should be taken serious rather taking the words from history always that Tajmahal is the representative symbol for love...rather it has a lot of internal history that was not documented else where or by anybody before in history....Great!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. plz..... pardon my saying..... As far as I know( I may b wrong),Taj mahal was built by Hindu workmen, so the trishul and hidden OM may be the influence of the hindu decorations they used to make on temples....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I Dont think so, Becoz workers dont dare to do that,,

      Delete
  4. When i heard tthe first time what the taj mahal was...it didnt feel right...the truth didnt ring...something felt disturbed. Now i feel the truth in this.! YES! TY. for spreading it. LJ*

    ReplyDelete
  5. Qiute possible...! The truth should be brought out. Maybe when some nationalist party comes to center, this should be brought to its notice. We should hope. and why not..?

    ReplyDelete
  6. o my god, this topic should publish all over India...actual history should know everybody....

    ReplyDelete
  7. everybody should know this actual history....news should spread all over India

    ReplyDelete
  8. we should open the doorssss

    ReplyDelete
  9. Opening gates will cause more chaos.Our country needs peaceful unity.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It's so good thought. There is a chance for that.

    ReplyDelete